Nexus-Alive · Autonomous Infrastructure

Your Infrastructure Fixes Itself Before You Know It's Broken

Nexus-Alive is a multi-agent system that continuously watches your infrastructure, predicts failures up to 60 minutes before they occur, and autonomously remediates them — with multi-model consensus before any high-impact action is taken.

60 min
Failure Prediction
Autonomous
Healing
Zero-Touch
Recovery
24
Use Cases
Agent Pipeline

Five Specialized Agent Teams

Each team is purpose-built for one phase of the detect → predict → heal → learn cycle. Together they form a closed loop that improves with every incident.

01

Discovery Team

DockerWatcherKubernetesWatcherGitHubWatcherServiceProber

Four watchers run continuously on 30-second health check cycles — inspecting container state, pod readiness, deployment history, and service endpoints. Every anomaly is emitted as a structured event with full context attached.

02

Analysis Team

HistoricalAnalyzerPatternMatcherTrendForecaster

Three analysis agents combine signals from three independent sources to produce a failure probability score. Historical patterns contribute 40%, recognized failure signatures 35%, and trend extrapolation 25%. The composite score drives remediation priority.

03

Healing Team

RemediationPlannerActionExecutorRollbackGuard

When the consensus vote clears, the Healing team executes the remediation plan in a sequence of atomic steps — each with a rollback checkpoint. If any step fails validation, the RollbackGuard restores the last known good state before surfacing the failure.

04

Consensus Team

GPT-4oClaudeGemini

Three independent language models review the proposed remediation plan and vote. A 2-of-3 majority is required before any action executes. No single model's reasoning can override the group — and all three reasoning chains are stored in GraphRAG for auditability.

05

Learning Team

PatternMinerKnowledgeWriterFeedbackIngester

After every resolved incident, PatternMiner extracts a reusable remediation pattern and writes it to GraphRAG. The next time a similar failure emerges, the Analysis team finds a proven solution — not a novel hypothesis. The system gets faster and more accurate with each cycle.

Prediction Engine

Three Sources. One Probability Score.

No single signal is reliable enough to act on. Nexus-Alive combines three independent analytical streams and weights them by proven predictive accuracy.

40%

Historical Patterns

Failure sequences observed in past incidents, stored in GraphRAG and matched against current telemetry. The longest-established predictor — high confidence, lower sensitivity to novel failure modes.

35%

Failure Signatures

Known precursor signatures — specific metric combinations that reliably precede failure. Updated by PatternMiner after every incident. Highest precision when a recognized pattern matches.

25%

Trend Extrapolation

Short-window trend analysis on memory, CPU, latency, and error rate metrics. Catches novel failure modes that have no historical precedent — lower confidence, but high coverage.

Composite formula
P(failure) = 0.40 × Historical + 0.35 × Signature + 0.25 × Trend

Weights are re-calibrated quarterly against realized outcomes across all production deployments.

Safety Architecture

No Single Model Decides Alone

Three independent language models review every proposed remediation. A 2-of-3 majority is required. All reasoning is stored and auditable.

GPT-4o
Primary reviewer
Claude
Independent analysis
Gemini
Adversarial check
Eliminates single-model bias
Each model has different training data, reasoning tendencies, and failure modes. Requiring 2-of-3 agreement means a single model's hallucination or overconfidence cannot trigger a production action.
Full reasoning stored in GraphRAG
Every vote — including dissenting reasoning — is written to GraphRAG with the incident record. Future incidents can query why a remediation was or was not approved, providing a learning signal for the consensus models themselves.
Threshold adapts to risk level
LOW-risk actions require only a simple majority. MEDIUM and HIGH risk require 2-of-3 plus a confidence threshold. CRITICAL actions are never autonomously executed — they always surface for human decision.
Sub-second voting latency
All three model evaluations run in parallel. The consensus result is available in under one second — fast enough that the voting step does not add meaningful delay to the remediation pipeline.
Risk Classification

Autonomous Where Safe. Gated Where It Matters.

Every proposed action is classified before execution. The classification determines the approval mode — not the on-call engineer's availability at 3am.

Risk LevelExample ActionsApproval ModeConsensus Required
LOWRestart crashed container, clear temp files, update config valueFully autonomousSimple majority
MEDIUMScale deployment, rotate secrets, modify resource limitsAuto + config change2-of-3 + confidence ≥ 0.8
HIGHDatabase failover, cluster node replacement, rollback deploymentHuman approval required2-of-3 + human sign-off
CRITICALData migration, production schema change, cross-region failoverNever autonomousFull human decision

Infrastructure That Heals Itself

See Nexus-Alive predict and resolve a live failure in a demo against your infrastructure configuration.